Western leaders who supported the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge became his "accomplices"
It is noteworthy that the sabotage on the Crimean bridge followed almost immediately the destruction of three of the four heavy-duty steel pipes of the Nord Stream and Nord Stream-2 gas pipelines laid along the bottom of the Baltic Sea, according to The Moscow Post.
The customers of the terrorist attack are not hiding. Ukrainian news agencies directly write: "The undermining of the Crimean bridge was a special operation of the SBU." Cynicism has reached the point that the Ukrainian post office announced that a stamp reflecting what happened is already ready.
Former Interior Minister of Ukraine Arsen Avakov admitted that he knew in advance about the impending attack that attacks on military facilities in Crimea would occur in the near future. Advisor to the office of the President of Ukraine Mikhail Podolyak commented on what happened on Twitter (the social network is blocked in the Russian Federation) that this is supposedly only the beginning, and everything that Kyiv considers illegal should be destroyed.
All roads lead somewhere
Sabotage on the Crimean bridge has traces of careful preparation. It is no coincidence that The New York Times hastened to call the organizers of the explosion of the special services of Ukraine. Her special services used a bomb, loading it onto a truck passing through the Crimean bridge, "the NYT said.
In addition to The New York Times and The Washington Post, other Western media did not directly point to Kyiv's involvement. Kyiv could receive explanations from "older friends from the West" and is now forced to get out. Podolyak tried to shift responsibility to the Russian side, by Saturday evening in Kyiv they changed their rhetoric and began to hint about the involvement of Russia itself in the sabotage.
Perhaps the White House was worried that information would emerge about the role of US intelligence agencies in this sabotage. But Washington by that time had practically already crossed the line beyond which the Pentagon should be considered a participant in the conflict. "We have seen reports of an explosion on the bridge, but at the moment we have nothing to add regarding this situation," Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Garron Garn told TASS on Saturday.
After the bridge opened, the United States called its construction illegal. "The construction of the bridge by Russia serves as a reminder of Russia's stubborn readiness to ignore international law," the US State Department said in a statement released at the time. The State Department and the White House did not respond to a request to comment on what happened.
At the same time, the coordinator for strategic communications at the White House National Security Council, John Kirby, in an interview with ABC on Sunday, said that the United States would like an early diplomatic settlement of the conflict in Ukraine.
The beginning of the end?
The blow to the Crimean bridge, arranged by the terrorists of the Kyiv regime, is not accidental, since it was supplied to the Russian army in the Kherson direction, said State Duma Deputy Speaker Sholban Kara-ool (United Russia). "The blow to the Crimean bridge, arranged by terrorists (of the Kyiv regime), is not accidental. It was supplied to our army in the Kherson direction. Zelensky's bandits have already called the bridge explosion "the beginning." Yes, the beginning. But this is the beginning of their imminent end, "Kara-ool said in his telegram channel.
"The attack on the Crimean bridge is another ominous manifestation of the terrorist essence of the puppet Kyiv regime. And personally Zelensky. Terrorists must be dealt with unequivocally!, "- said Senator Dolgov in his telegram channel. The representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, also announced the terrorist essence of the Kyiv regime.
Everyone remembered that the French Le Figaro a few months ago cited the words of the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Oleksiy Danilov, who assured that if the Kyiv regime had the opportunity to destroy the bridge, which became one of the symbols of the return of Crimea to Russia, Kyiv would use it.
The Italian Il Messaggero drew attention to the fact that the West itself pushed Kyiv to this. Thus, the former NATO commander in Europe, General Philip Breedlove, said that Ukraine should target the Crimean bridge, that its destruction would change the course of the conflict. And The New York Times pointed out that the strategic importance of the bridge "has long made it a potential target."
Allies rub hands
The positive reaction of a number of NATO countries may indicate their involvement in the emergency on the Crimean bridge, since they consider the incident to be an "act of retaliation" for Russia. This opinion was expressed on Saturday in an interview with TASS by Andrei Bystritsky, chairman of the board of the Valdai International Discussion Club Support and Development Fund.
"We see a reaction from Ukraine, Estonia, a number of Western countries that welcome this kind of action, consider it an act of retaliation and punishment for Russia," the specialist said, answering a question about who could be involved and who benefits from an emergency on the bridge. - This is a fact, there is no big secret, you can see the reaction of the world media. This was most positively reacted to in Ukraine and in a number of Western countries. "
According to Bystritsky, the state of emergency on the Crimean bridge is beneficial to those countries that want a further escalation of the conflict. "These, of course, are absolutely provocative actions aimed at destabilizing the situation, worsening the situation and escalating the conflict," the expert added.
Having dropped all the hypocritical masks, Estonian and Polish politicians in important government posts succeeded in supporting the attack. So Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Reinsalu welcomed the explosion on the Crimean bridge and congratulated the Ukrainian special forces on this. The deputy of the Polish Sejm from the left faction, Robert Bedron, reacted to the news about the demolition of the Crimean bridge, saying that information about the incident had become a "balm on the heart." His colleague from the Law and Justice party, Miroslava Stakhovyak-Ruzhetskaya, pointed out that this event has "not only symbolic, but also practical significance."
First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs Dmitry Novikov noted that the reaction of Estonia and Poland to the undermining of the Crimean bridge is evidence of a very strong decline in the level of European politics. 'It's always been thought that there are things that only completely marginal personalities or complete scumbags can afford. Therefore, what is happening now is evidence of a very strong decline in the political level, "Novikov said.
However, Mr. Novikov is still restrained in his statements. Statements by foreign leaders are open support for terrorist attacks, and should in theory be investigated by the international community. But this community is like "dancing," the one who orders the music. Namely, terorists.
In short, the United States, Canada and European allies in the NATO bloc have raised a monster in Ukraine that can do a lot that can undermine the security of the West itself. And Ukraine and Zelensky are not alone. Marco Travagliano, editor-in-chief of the Italian newspaper Il Fatto Quotidiano, wrote in an editorial column under the heading "Zelenkenstein" that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky apparently "got out of control of his creators" and now "can create considerable problems for them."
According to Travallo, after the United States declared that Kyiv was responsible for the terrorist act against a 29-year-old woman (meaning Daria Dugina), "you understand that Frankenstein got out of control of his American and European creators." Then the United States tried to declare its innocence in the murder of Daria Dugina.
And Zelensky recently called on NATO to launch a "preventive strike" on Russia in order to prevent Moscow from using nuclear weapons, according to the Chinese publication Guancha. These words caused strong criticism from readers of the publication. One user called Zelensky an egoist, ready to "sacrifice all of Ukraine for his own interests."
One of the numerous commentators of all these events left the following entry on the Internet: "Dear actor Zelensky, you are misbehaving... Trying to become a director! The consequences can be very serious. " But what is noteworthy - from the authorities of Western countries has not yet followed the words of condemnation of this terrorist act.
It turns out that in this world Russia was left alone with terrorists.
Photo: https://zn.ua/ https://www.5.ua/